Sunday Newsletter

Masses Today

6.30: Joe Dolan, Bowling Green, (Anniv).
11.00: Gerry Colgan, Maureen & Michael Kieran, (Anniv).
6.30: Bryan Flaherty, (Anniv)


As I Was Saying...

Every February, chocolates, flowers, and gifts are exchanged between lovers and aspiring lovers, and all in the name of St. Valentine. But he fails to feature in the official calendar of the Church. So how did his name come to be associated with this annual 'mating ritual'? St. Valentine's Day contains vestiges of both Christian and pagan tradition.

One legend contends that Valentine was a priest who served during the third century in Rome. When Emperor Claudius II decided that single men made better soldiers than those who had wives and families, he outlawed marriage for young men. Valentine, realizing the injustice of the decree, defied Claudius and continued to perform marriages for young lovers in secret. When Valentine's actions were discovered, Claudius ordered that he be put to death.

While the story is charming, it can't be true. Until the fourth century, the Church forbade its members to bear arms, and a Church ceremony for marriage did not develop for another five centuries! So the whole Valentine saga is mythological. But a myth can be far more powerful than a story that is literally true. Myth is transmitted from one generation to another, expressing some aspects of that particular community's self-understanding.

Successive generations will inhabit that myth, giving it their own 'spin'. For example, the Students' Unions in all the third level colleges are celebrating Valentine's by organising what they have rather subtly named a 'Shag Week'. The promised treats will include a sexual health quiz, an Ann Summers Party, Speed Dating, photo exhibit, condom games to increase familiarity and comfort with condoms, and one of the highlights of the week will be the Pretty In Pink SHAG Ball.

Between 2004 and 2009 there was a five-fold increase in STDs in Galway. The church believes that the teachings of Jesus bring health and wholeness. His message is 'salvation itself' because it is deeply rooted in human reality. But this conclusion flies in the face of today's culture which treats sex as just another bodily function. Since sex is supposedly value-free, 'sex education' is reduced to mere medical and technical information. The psychological and spiritual dimensions of sexuality are ignored. Damage is inevitable. But who will say this publicly?

The church, when it dares to speak on sex, is dismissed as 'out of touch'. Jewish academic Leon Kass remarks, "Safe sex is the self-delusion of shallow souls". Sex should be a dangerous activity. What could be more dangerous than to lose yourself to another person and to embark upon childbirth and parenting?

When we ignore this, sex is reduced to advice on techniques commonly found in teenage magazines. Then partners cease to hold the promise of lifelong love. They are reduced instead to the means of gratification. What looked like freedom has turned out to be the tightest bondage to a false eroticism and turmoil in marital affairs. I'm not advocating a return to the neurotic, unhealthy 1950s. But who would claim present practices are healthy? We must retrieve that deep Christian insight into the workings of the human soul. Happy Valentine!

-Dick Lyng


Difficult Times


Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin was born on February 12th, 1809, 200 years ago this week. This 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin has led not only to celebration of his life but also extensive discussion concerning the religious consequences of his work. Atheism and six day creationism have given the impression that the legacy of Darwin is that God is a delusion, fulfilling George Bernard Shaw's comment that "Darwin had the luck to please everybody who had an axe to grind." Meanwhile, other religious commentators have been queuing up to say that Darwin and the Bible can walk hand in hand in celebrating the grandeur of this world.

As a physicist, a theologian and an evangelical Christian, I'm not in the camp of either atheism or six day creationism. I am immensely grateful for Darwin. I take seriously the weight of evidence for evolution and am filled with wonder at the world it so successfully describes. He doesn't undermine my belief in a Creator God, but I do find he asks difficult questions for faith.

In that I'm not alone. The response to Darwin in the 19th century was complex and varied, contrary to the popular myth that evolution undermined the church which believed that the Universe was 6000 years old. From the earliest Jewish and Christian thinkers through to church leaders in the 1860s, few were biblical literalists and most didn't see Genesis Chapter 1 as a scientific textbook.

Indeed, some of the early supporters of evolution were evangelical Christians, "Darwin's Forgotten Defenders" as they have been called. Darwin did however undermine two popular religious arguments. Natural selection gave a powerful alternative to the attempt of proving God from intelligent design. It also questioned the assertion that human beings were unique by virtue of being created separately from other species. In fact, I find neither argument at the core of my Christian faith.

For Christians, the evidence for the existence and nature of God isn't seen primarily in the natural world, but in the claim that God is revealed in the person of Jesus Christ.

Further, human beings, even though we are made out of the same stuff as the rest of creation, are special because of the divine gift of intimate relationship with God.

Yet one serious question remains. Darwin shows me a God creating a world which is dynamic and awe-inspiring in its complexity. But I don't fully understated why this creativity involves such violence and waste.

Perhaps it's because it is the only way that such a world can be created. Would God work like that? If I see God redeeming through the violence and waste of a man dying on a cross, I can accept that he can work through evolution too.

-Revd Dr David Wilkinson.


Parish Meeting

Keep in mind our General Meeting on Monday night week, February 23rd at 7.30. We drew up a tentative agenda for it at our Steering Committee meeting this week. (1) Update on Augustinian Project. (2) Financial Report. (3) Child Protection Report. (4) Recession: how can the Church help? (5) Parish Groups. (6) Young people: can we do something for them? (6) St. Nicholas's - the future. (7) Appeal for more helpers. (8) Ongoing maintenance. (9) A.O.B. Items for the agenda are still welcome. Send them to Dick Lyng or Gerry Ferguson.


Top

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict