Sunday Newsletter

Masses Today

6.30: Joan Lally (nee O'Sullivan), (Anniv).
11.00 Agnes Margetts; Betty Creasa, (Anniv).
6.30: Frank Duggan, (Anniv).

As I Was Saying...

The Olympic Games will be held in Beijing this Summer. The 1980 Moscow Olympics were the last major 'ideological' games. Enormous resources were poured into the preparatory propaganda. The 'impeccable' human rights record of the host nation was stressed. These games would surpass, in style, scale and skill, all its predecessors.

Unfortunately, the USSR government and the Soviet Olympic organisers weren't reading from the one score-sheet. Because, on Christmas Day, 1979, the Soviet leadership sent 100,000 troops into Afghanistan. The inevitable happened. Some 60 teams boycotted the Moscow Games. The U.S. Government threatened to withdraw the passports of any U.S. athlete who opted to attend in a personal capacity. Great Britain, France, Italy and Sweden did attend. Some countries did not officially send teams but took no action against athletes who attended. If they won medals, those athletes were greeted on the medal stand by the Olympic hymn and flag, rather than their national anthem and flag. From the Soviet point of view, the Olympics was a total disaster, though they couldn't admit it at the time.

So what of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing? Will questions be asked publicly about human rights abuses such as the 'one child per family rule'? (Those who violate this rule are evicted from their home, expelled from their job and severed from all state benefits). President Mary McAleese and a large business delegation made an official visit to China five years ago. Gordon Browne, the British PM followed in her footsteps this week. If either of them raised this matter, they didn't make much fuss about it. Perhaps both were satisfied, when China's leaders assured them that they were as committed as anyone else to liberty, equality and democracy - though in their own good time.

China fears the Catholic Church. There are two Churches, really; the 'Official', and 'unofficial' model. In the former, bishops are appointed by the Chinese communist government, and they live undisturbed lives. In the latter, Rome appoints the bishops, and they live a persecuted, underground existence. At least five of them languish in prison still. The authorities are scared of the way the Church pulled the ideological rug from beneath the Marxist regimes in Eastern Europe. It was a bitter lesson that they were forced to watch, China is right to be wary.

But why are our great western leaders silent in the face of such blatant abuses? What is the difference, in terms of human rights violation, between 1980 and 2008? The answer may be found by looking around your local supermarket at the many goods on display that originated in China. The Chinese economic miracle is generated by the sweat of workers slaving for 50 cent per day. Is this not a terrible exploitation of people and an abuse of human rights? And if so, aren't we all implicated in it, we who enjoy buying cheap consumer goods made in China? This may explain the silence of our morally bankrupt western leaders!

-Dick Lyng


Church Collections: New System

We have been beating around the bush (not George!) on this matter for over three years now. We were advised at that time to move from a 'basket collection' to an 'envelope collection.' But, because the Church Project and its financing was then our central concern, we kept postponing the change. There is no point in postponing the evil day any longer.

The system we are about to adopt works as follows: each family gets a box containing 52 envelopes, one for each week of the year, obviously. Each envelope is marked by a number. On the distribution of each box, that number is slotted down against the 'receiving' family. So the envelope will be identified by number rather than by name. As the individual envelope is opened, the amount is written on the envelope, beside the number. (This ensures anonymity. The only person who will know the identity of the donor will be the one keeping the records.) You are all probably familiar with the system as it has been working for years in most parishes.

So why move from our present 'basket collection' to this complex 'envelope collection'? The following reasons prompted us to make the move:


Bits and Pieces....


Top

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict